Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Maximillion Pegasus

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship, request for bureaucratship, request for checkusership, or request for oversightship. Please do not modify it.

Maximillion Pegasus (talk · contribs)

End date: 14:50 2 November 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to propose Maximillion Pegasus for the position of administrator on Wikipedia (for the purposes of this nomination, I'll call him Max). Max is a long-time contributor to the project who's edited for over 1 1/2 years. In that time he's created numerous articles, diligently fought spam and vandalism, and taken part in countless community discussions. Max is also an administrator on a number of other projects including Wikiquote and Wikibooks. I think he can be of great assistance with the extra buttons, and I'm confident you'll agree. Thanks! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:53, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance:I accept. I would like to clear up any worries about my March-Sep. break this year. I had real life issues that came up that had to take precedence over Wikipedia, these issues have been worked out now and I do not plan on taking a break like that again. (except for the occasional 2 or three day wikibreak that everyone takes every now and then :) ) Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 14:50, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Support - Even though you didn't edit between mid-march and mid-september. I trust you with the tools. Yotcmdr ^{=talk to the commander=} 14:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Support - very good and trustworthy editor. And I even got my vote in before the RFA closed. Whatever next? The Rambling Man (talk) 14:53, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   You'll stop being sarcastic? :) fr33kman ^talk 03:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3. Support - Very good vandal fighter who knows what vandalism is just by looking through a few of his/her reversions. User will be of good use to the vandal fighting area, and Wikipedia will benefit from this user being an administrator. —Mythdon ^{[talk] [changes]} 16:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Support Good choice. :) Pmlineditor ∞ 16:06, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
5. Support a good choice for the tools. I'm sure he'll be helpful. I've no concerns with him as an admin. Barras (talk) 16:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
6. No need to explain any absences, behind every keyboard is a real life human. Happy to support. fr33kman ^talk 20:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
7. Support I can't find anything to make me wish to oppose.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 21:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
8. Support I too have been on a long wiki break from this wiki but wont go into those details as they are personal to me. But I would trust Maximillion with the tools as they have done some good vandal fighting and also a trusted user. Corruptcopper (talk) 17:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
9. Support *sigh* I now have to wait as another person that I know is given the sysop tools. Anyways, I support this user becoming a sysop because he knows the policies, and has my trust, being a fellow sysop on the Simple English Wiktionary. Cheers, Razorflame 22:05, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
10. Support Seen him around. He knows what he's doing, and he'll be a fine addition to the admin team. — RyanCross (talk) 00:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
11. Support Sounds like a trustworthy user who will know how to use the tools correctly. EhJJ^TALK 01:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.