Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 July 27

< July 26	July 28 >

July 27

File:Daniel Liddell In Black.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:55, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 13:37, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Black Flag in performance (1984).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are free alternatives--I replaced it in the article. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:33, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carrie Underwood, Ryman Auditorium, Nashville, Tennessee, July 19, 2019.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image is not a free image; claims to be owned by the uploader, however, is also found on multiple websites, under ownership to AFF-USA/Shutterstock, and requires an editorial license. livelikemusic talk! 16:05, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:37, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carrie Underwood, Grand Ole Opry, Nashville, Tennessee, July 19, 2019.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image is not a free image; claims to be owned by the uploader, however, is also found on multiple websites, under ownership to AFF-USA/Shutterstock, and requires an editorial license. livelikemusic talk! 16:05, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:37, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Mind of Jake Paul Poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fan made poster; it contains a picture [middle] from the copyrighted documentary The Mind of Jake Paul. That picture could be uploaded as fair use or the original poster (that this one is based off) could be uploaded as fair use. Abequinn14 (talk) 19:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Abequinn14: Why? I didn’t have any problem with it. Coasterdude1 (talk) 19:48, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Coasterdude1: Because you used a copyrighted image in your freely licensed image, which is a copyright violation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Abequinn14 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Coasterdude1: Do you have the ability to edit the raw layered image? If so, then I suggest simply replacing the photo of Jake Paul you used with this rather similar one. The image of the "skull" should be fine (especially if you used a CCO image, if not then we can just call it {{PD-Shape}}/{{PD-medical}}. Then you can re-upload to commons and replace the license with CC-BY-3.0 or 4.0. That way it is a completely free image to use on all our language Wikipedias! Cheers, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, the image currently exists in limbo. While you own the copyright to the transformative work (the whole thing), Shane Dawson owns the copyright on that one picture of Jake Paul's face. I ran into a similar issue with File:Two Gormiti figures.jpg. While I took the photo (much like you made the poster), I featured the work of someone else (in my case it was the toys themselves, but in yours it is the photo of Jake Paul). Hope that helps clarify things! :D –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:13, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A fan-made fake poster is not good for identification of the topic. Please use something real and official. If there is no official poster, use something else. The title screen (which is included in this image) alone should be good enough and would meet NFCC. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 08:24, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uganda cricket team logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicensed to non-free -FASTILY 21:48, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have been unable to verify that this image has been released into the public domain as claimed by the uploader. The source is simply a profile picture on a facebook page, I can find no release of permissions there, and the uploader has no apparent connection to Cricket Uganda. I also found no release on the Cricket Uganda home page http://www.cricketuganda.world/index.php Their intent may be to release it (I see no copyright notice) but unless we can verify that I think we have to assume that this is a copyrighted logo. I'll be happy to withdraw this if someone can spot a permission I missed. Meters (talk) 19:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 13:39, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alamo1846.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

missing verifiable source FASTILY 19:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Has a verifiable source - the Daughters of the Republic of Texas. Ease of access to the source does not affect verifiability. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:56, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that WP:SOURCEACCESS does not affect verifiability. However, the Daughters of the Republic of Texas is an association, and it does not make sense to cite this entity as a direct source. Perhaps you could clarify if this item is in their museum, was scanned, etc. -FASTILY 06:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is available from their library. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -FASTILY 23:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:François-Joseph Gossec, composer, Saint-Georges’ teacher and mentor.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

missing verifiable source FASTILY 20:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - has a verifiable source, BnF confirms an 1800s publication. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.