Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wagon Wheel (biscuit)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily keep. Kilo•T 18:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A consensus was reached at DRV to overturn the speedy deletion of this article [1]. This is a procedural nomination so I abstain. Thryduulf 15:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the article seems reasonably well-written and not blatant advertisement. FrozenPurpleCube 16:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep for the more reasonable reason that this is a highly notable product (and has been for at least 20 years) --Dweller 16:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment 263,000 Google hits for "wagon wheel biscuit" ([2]) --Dweller 16:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Strongest possible keep. All claims of corporate spam aside, you'll stuggle to find a British person who hasn't at least heard of these. —Xezbeth 16:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's a bit like someone slapping an Afd on Oreos --Dweller 16:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep an iconic (but inedible) product. Should be here. Martín (saying/doing) 16:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep. There's no way that this article ever met WP:SPEEDY, and it is clearly highly noteable. The article isn't great, but it's not bad, and it's not advertising. --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 17:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep. Iconic in the UK, indeed.--MichaelMaggs 18:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.