Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Hell (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Discounting the blocked socks, there is clear consensus to delete. Nakon 02:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Living Hell (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Major COI issue here-band members have the names of the contributors. Not sure about notability either Wgolf (talk) 17:04, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This band is notable per wikipedia guidelines

Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).

Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.[note 6] This should be adapted appropriately for musical genre; for example, having performed two lead roles at major opera houses.

Furthermore - I don't see a COI here? Because of the picture? I don't think that qualifies?

Thanks,

Tim — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.161.14.35 (talk) 19:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COI is due to the fact one of the major contributors has the same name as one of the band members. I actually don't mind if a obscure band, obscure film, ect have pages to be honest, but this is a bit much.Wgolf (talk) 19:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just think marking it for deletion is a bit much. This and the other article aren't promoting anything. The bands releases are notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.161.14.35 (talk) 19:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete IP, there do not seem to be two notable musicians within this band. Who is the 2nd one, I only see Craig Mack being asserted as notable? I can't see how this meets WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Possibly worth a redirect to Craig Walendziak. Coi is pretty clear: WP:SPA creator and an WP:SPA contributor with 'Craig Mack' in his username. You've commented here as an IP. Are you the same user as the two I've just named? Are you connected to the band or any of its members? Boleyn (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Boleyn-also check out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Follow Through (Band)-same issue. Wgolf (talk) 19:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but they definitely meet the: *** Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).*** requirement. 66.161.14.35 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see this band satisfying WP:NBAND based on members, coverage, or releases. I didn't find much beyond a staff review at punknews.org ([1]) and a couple of news items on Blabbermouth.net ([2], [3]). --Michig (talk) 20:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Michig. Geogene (talk) 21:14, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep easily meets the "Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels" requirement.Both labels have Wikipedia pages.Both releases are listed. 76.119.12.233 (talk)

Comment-also adding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Walendziak to this. Wgolf (talk) 23:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I created this page. I did so because I like the band. I was happy to see the singer was writing movies. If you need two records from a notable indie label Living Hell meets this requirement. Popular band for their genre. Dilbert Grapes (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Michig. --DThomsen8 (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.