Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camilla Hall (2nd nomination)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Golbez 05:54, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Previous nomination resulted in a keep; however, Camilla Hall never had a VfD tag. Because of this, I am renominating it. No vote. --cesarb 02:14, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Merge with Symbianese Liberation Army in a section called #Slain members. There is some slight historical interest in the biographies of the SLA members, but I very much doubt that the members will be sought by their names. Geogre 03:03, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - member of notable criminal/terrorist/whatever group and had minor, but notable role in that group's violent demise. --FCYTravis 03:28, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect with the SLA article. Hall is non-notable outside the SLA, thus, the article is non-notable outside of the SLA article. Fifelfoo 04:09, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, bios are better separate. Kappa 04:10, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, significant enough. ℬastique▼^talk 05:22, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, as per previous vote as member of famous terrorist group. Capitalistroadster 05:32, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Significant figure in the movement. JamesBurns 05:56, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• 'Merge with Symbionese Liberation Army. I believe its better to describe the SLA members within the SLA page. An An 07:23, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment I am inclined to think she should be kept, but note there have been inconsistent results on SLA members, as some have been redirected (eg. James Kilgore). Of course, since Angela Atwood et al., were kept, I guess consistency is already impossible. Xoloz 07:35, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I guess if consistency is impossible, she might as well stand-alone. This is longer than many stubs, so I don't see reason to merge it. Xoloz 07:40, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Significiant biographical data in the article. Share_Bear
  • I just want to comment on this idea that the article contains significant biographical data. A birthdate of 1945, having three dead siblings, being an uncollected artist and lesbian is not encyclopedic in itself. The set of 1945 birthdates is great. The set of people with three dead siblings is great. The set of being an uncollected artist is great. The set of lesbians is great. None of these sets are inherently encyclopedic. The intersection of the sets is also not encyclopedic. Fifelfoo 03:14, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • One might argue that being an SLA member makes her notable, and thus, "the intersection of the sets" embodied in an SLA member makes the other information notable (it might be useful in studies of comparative criminology, psychology, etc) Xoloz 06:11, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as merge and redirect with Symbianese Liberation Army. That is her sole source of notoriety. She should be discussed in context. The article has been virtually unexpanded since 2002, leaving me skeptical that the article will ever be expanded past stub status. Rossami (talk) 12:32, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep she is a historical person. ConeyCyclone 17:27, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Jinkleberries 19:56, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Note: Junkleberries is a new account today and voted 'keep' on 37 articles within a 7-minute period. This user also received a vandalism warning today. Tobycat 20:54, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Person of (minor) historical significance. Pburka 00:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.