Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binary priority list

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:44, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Binary priority list

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little indication of notability beyond a couple of research papers. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. PepperBeast (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. Additionally, the topic of using X method of sorting to manage backlog in industry Y would likely be a case of WP:CROSSCAT. PaulT2022 (talk) 17:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Not eligible for Soft Deletion as previously PROD'd.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No indication of passing GNG. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.