Jump to content

Talk:Mamiya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Camera updates

[edit]

Hmmm... Time to post some information about the cameras themselves? From the Super Deluxe all the way to the RZ...

Please do! Fg2 10:52, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote an RZ67 article based on my own experience with RZ's. I'll post something about 645M later too. piksi 14:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I also corrected some of the spellings of the model names. RZ and RB models are officially written as R*67 ABC DEF, for example RZ67 Pro IID. It is much easier to find information of the cameras with the correct model names. piksi 15:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add the bit on the Mamiya Universal System. I can even provide photos of almost all the accessories- or at least nearly the complete lens line... Jdos2 05:14, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That'd be great! Thanks Fg2 05:57, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone owning a RB67 write a similar article on it than what I did for RZ67? (or perhaps combine them in two because they are quite similar cameras although different models. I'm not sure if they both deserve their own article). --piksi (talk) 10:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated

[edit]

https://www.dpreview.com/articles/1970037207/phase-one-buys-mamiya-gains-ownership-of-camera-and-lens-production

http://www.takesontech.com/medium-format-camera-makers-mamiya-leaf-merge

http://www.macnn.com/articles/12/01/16/medium.format.camera.makers.mamiya.leaf.merge/

The website of Mamiya Japan does not work.84.229.35.42 (talk) 09:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request to update: Revival of Mamiya brand and take over of trade mark and domain

[edit]

The Mamiya brand is being revived in the UK. The trade mark has been acquired along with the the domain name by company in the UK. Also articles on Mamiya RB67 and RZ67 cameras is incorrect and written by "fan" and "enthusiasts" who do not have access to data and facts from the brand owner. Some information is subjective not objective. Opcouk (talk) 12:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]