Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Bargal (2007)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Really a Battle?

[edit]

Was this attack really a battle? It seemed from all accounts that it was more of a raid to me. The ICU didn't put up much of a fight and there were no US casualties....were they even on the ground to fight them? -- Permafrost 03:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hmm seems Puntland forces were on the ground. Unfortunately no more info. I would support changing to Bargal raid --TheFEARgod (Ч) 14:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I think a raid would be more appropriate until better information can be obtained, if ever. -- Permafrost 11:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We'd have to ask the question, though, is this raid really notable? For comparison, there are tons of small raids like this that have happened in Iraq that don't have their own articles on Wikipedia, so it wouldn't be a matter of combating systemic bias. — ዮም | (Yom) | TalkcontribsEthiopia 22:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, there is a point in that, except that raids in Iraq are very common due to the continuing presence of US forces there. In Somalia, the US has been rather touchy about intervening (as with any other African case since Somalia 1993) and may well be notable due to the targetting of suspects from the 1998 US embassy bombings in Kenya. There are other articles on raids that may or may not be notable going by your perspective. -- Permafrost 04:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Bargal (2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]