User contributions for OyMosby
Appearance
Results for OyMosby talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 5,776 edits. Account created on 3 June 2017.
11 July 2024
- 14:3514:35, 11 July 2024 diff hist −193 Šibenik →Early history: looking at the citation, this isn’t mentioned.
- 14:2414:24, 11 July 2024 diff hist +20 Šibenik →Early history: improved is it previously implied it contradicted the previous sentence.
- 14:1314:13, 11 July 2024 diff hist −17 Šibenik Reverting as is not the only historical name for this town
6 July 2024
- 16:0016:00, 6 July 2024 diff hist +98 User talk:Cdjp1 →Genocide Sidebare
- 15:5915:59, 6 July 2024 diff hist +875 User talk:Cdjp1 →Genocide Sidebare: new section Tag: New topic
- 14:3814:38, 6 July 2024 diff hist +29 User talk:Vanjagenije →Genocide Bar and Chetnik War Crimes
- 14:3514:35, 6 July 2024 diff hist +48 User talk:Vanjagenije →Genocide Bar and Chetnik War Crimes
- 14:3214:32, 6 July 2024 diff hist +758 User talk:Vanjagenije →Genocide Bar and Chetnik War Crimes: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:3813:38, 6 July 2024 diff hist +838 User talk:Vanjagenije →Genocide Bar and Chetnik War Crimes: new section Tag: New topic
- 13:2713:27, 6 July 2024 diff hist +1,412 Chetnik war crimes in World War II Undid revision 1232935352 by Vanjagenije (talk) Not sure how this edit is constructive. Removes sourced content. Removes Genocide Bar despite article being part of it. Removes Reprisals from info bar despise citations. Adds redundant further reading link. Tag: Undo
4 July 2024
- 00:2800:28, 4 July 2024 diff hist +44 Dalmatian dog Fixed new citation
- 00:2000:20, 4 July 2024 diff hist +388 Dalmatian dog Further sources acknowledging Croatia as the country of origin as apposed to IP attempts at separating Dalmatia from Croatia historically. In conflict with the sources.
- 00:1100:11, 4 July 2024 diff hist −12 Dalmatian dog Per the literal Britannica source itself. It doesn’t say “Present day” which would be Wiki Independent Research
31 May 2024
- 19:1919:19, 31 May 2024 diff hist +68 User talk:Buidhe →Ethnic Cleansing Article
- 19:1019:10, 31 May 2024 diff hist +774 User talk:Buidhe →Ethnic Cleansing Article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:0219:02, 31 May 2024 diff hist +1,156 User talk:OyMosby →Dalmatia reverts: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:5318:53, 31 May 2024 diff hist +4 Ethnic cleansing →Genocide: link to Armenian genocide article
- 18:5018:50, 31 May 2024 diff hist 0 Ethnic cleansing More appropriate here
- 18:4818:48, 31 May 2024 diff hist −2,855 Ethnic cleansing →As a military, political, and economic tactic: agree with other user this is UNDUE and not consensus as many non-Italian victims was targeted in this reprisal. As with the lead, this modern take on Yugoslav wars provides a good example. Tag: harv-error
- 18:3318:33, 31 May 2024 diff hist +35 Ethnic cleansing These were swapped but this eems more notorious and fitting for the lead of the two in regarding to the Yugoslav Wars and coining of the phrase.
27 May 2024
- 16:1716:17, 27 May 2024 diff hist +1,298 Dalmatia Undid revision 1225720213 by Botushali (talk) Isn’t the onus on the one changing the stable form? Hence removing long-standing information should require talking it out on the talk page. It seems recently removed rather than added. Tag: Undo
26 May 2024
- 18:0518:05, 26 May 2024 diff hist +118 User talk:Buidhe →Ethnic Cleansing Article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:4917:49, 26 May 2024 diff hist +341 User talk:Buidhe →Ethnic Cleansing Article: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:4017:40, 26 May 2024 diff hist +134 User talk:Buidhe →Ethnic Cleansing Article
- 17:3817:38, 26 May 2024 diff hist +40 User talk:Buidhe →Ethnic Cleansing Article
- 17:3817:38, 26 May 2024 diff hist +715 User talk:Buidhe →Ethnic Cleansing Article: new section Tag: New topic
- 17:3217:32, 26 May 2024 diff hist +53 Ethnic cleansing →Etymology: from source
- 17:2217:22, 26 May 2024 diff hist +70 Ethnic cleansing →Etymology: reference to the name of the genocide
- 17:2017:20, 26 May 2024 diff hist −181 Ethnic cleansing →Etymology: Undue given why would it be significant who was the first individual in every nationality to use the term, also for next sentence is not what the sources said. It said both factions used the word. Not the order.
- 14:0514:05, 26 May 2024 diff hist +2,151 List of ethnic cleansing campaigns →1940s: This was removed as “unsourced” in September 2023 despite being sourced.
25 May 2024
- 16:4316:43, 25 May 2024 diff hist +45 List of genocides →List of genocides: given this covers all three Tag: Disambiguation links added
- 16:3416:34, 25 May 2024 diff hist +14 List of genocides →List of genocides: why was this part removed? Seems a significant change of context
- 16:1516:15, 25 May 2024 diff hist +38 Pula →Post–World War II and modern era: citations needed
24 May 2024
- 22:4622:46, 24 May 2024 diff hist −10 Dubrovnik Seems undue since both historically used and where the city is in modern day. Did the edit have consensus when added? Returned to typical format like other city articles
- 22:4122:41, 24 May 2024 diff hist −8 Dubrovnik Historically both were used.
- 22:0222:02, 24 May 2024 diff hist +53 Rijeka Undid revision 1225463494 by 37.212.57.4 (talk) Why? Unexplained Tag: Undo
- 22:0222:02, 24 May 2024 diff hist +29 Zadar Undid revision 1225463247 by 37.212.57.4 (talk) Why? Unexplained Tag: Undo
21 May 2024
- 04:5304:53, 21 May 2024 diff hist −8 Rijeka Again, just as all other language versions listed, follow format
- 04:5104:51, 21 May 2024 diff hist −37 Zadar Format for city articles with multi lingual name listing
- 04:4904:49, 21 May 2024 diff hist −49 Split, Croatia Per format of city articles with multiple language names
- 04:4104:41, 21 May 2024 diff hist +54 Zadar If concern is for modern day Italian speaking population in this region, this would appear better wording
- 04:3604:36, 21 May 2024 diff hist +96 Split, Croatia If representation for the modern Italian speaking population there, this would seem a better wording
- 04:2804:28, 21 May 2024 diff hist −166 Split, Croatia This was added with an edit summary “fix”. Spalato became the official name in the 18th century so it seems undue and misleading to imply it was the definitive historical name. There were multiple forms. Hence the original “others names” section redirect makes more sense. Unless there was mass consensus on this which I didn’t see?
- 04:1504:15, 21 May 2024 diff hist −284 Zadar Was there consensus for this addition? Seems numerous edit wars had followed. There wasn’t only one historical name so this is undue and pov. Mentions of Zadar in the 12th century had predated Zara of the 15th century per Etymology section. And there were other names before. Why would Zara be defacto the historical term? This implies some nation’s having more important than others. The original direction to the naming section is neutral. Has been for many years. Unless I am missing something?
13 May 2024
- 20:0720:07, 13 May 2024 diff hist +665 User talk:Miki Filigranski →Dalmatia Talk Discussion: new section Tag: New topic
9 May 2024
- 13:5313:53, 9 May 2024 diff hist −2 User talk:Rossbawse →May 2024 current
- 13:5213:52, 9 May 2024 diff hist −1 User talk:Rossbawse →May 2024
- 13:5213:52, 9 May 2024 diff hist +678 User talk:Rossbawse →May 2024: new section Tag: New topic
- 12:5012:50, 9 May 2024 diff hist −54 Franjo Tuđman Undid revision 1221641482 by Rossbawse (talk) Is this valid given his speech in Israel condemning the Holocaust and the Croatian Ustashe participation in the Holocaust? Tag: Undo
- 11:1711:17, 9 May 2024 diff hist +18 Ustaše No edit summary