User contributions for Cutterx2202
Appearance
Results for Cutterx2202 talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 88 edits. Account created on 14 December 2008.
15 November 2021
- 20:0220:02, 15 November 2021 diff hist +137 User talk:Cutterx2202 No edit summary
- 20:0020:00, 15 November 2021 diff hist +22 User talk:Cutterx2202 No edit summary
- 19:5519:55, 15 November 2021 diff hist +316 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Cutterx2202
- 19:4919:49, 15 November 2021 diff hist −236 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 19:4519:45, 15 November 2021 diff hist +377 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 19:2819:28, 15 November 2021 diff hist +323 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 19:1119:11, 15 November 2021 diff hist +324 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 19:0519:05, 15 November 2021 diff hist −373 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Cutterx2202
- 19:0319:03, 15 November 2021 diff hist +383 User talk:Cutterx2202 →Copy Pasta Mistake
- 18:5218:52, 15 November 2021 diff hist +267 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 18:5018:50, 15 November 2021 diff hist +944 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Cutterx2202
- 18:3718:37, 15 November 2021 diff hist +937 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 18:0718:07, 15 November 2021 diff hist +639 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 17:5717:57, 15 November 2021 diff hist +295 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 17:5017:50, 15 November 2021 diff hist +329 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 17:3517:35, 15 November 2021 diff hist +487 User talk:Cutterx2202 →Copy Pasta Mistake
- 17:2817:28, 15 November 2021 diff hist +819 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 16:5616:56, 15 November 2021 diff hist +10 User talk:Cutterx2202 →Copy Pasta Mistake
- 16:5516:55, 15 November 2021 diff hist +718 User talk:Cutterx2202 →Copy Pasta Mistake
14 November 2021
- 03:5903:59, 14 November 2021 diff hist +513 User talk:Cutterx2202 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
13 November 2021
- 21:0821:08, 13 November 2021 diff hist −1,369 User talk:Cutterx2202 →Copy Pasta Mistake Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:0521:05, 13 November 2021 diff hist +471 User talk:Cutterx2202 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:0416:04, 13 November 2021 diff hist +319 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 15:3715:37, 13 November 2021 diff hist +500 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 15:2615:26, 13 November 2021 diff hist −1,504 User talk:Cutterx2202 Appears this garbage was posted on the wrong user's page. Links were referring to user "Correct" not myself. Tag: Manual revert
- 15:1915:19, 13 November 2021 diff hist +299 Talk:Black Lives Matter →Why is there no mention of rioting?
- 14:3014:30, 13 November 2021 diff hist +273 Talk:Black Lives Matter No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
6 May 2019
- 13:3413:34, 6 May 2019 diff hist +8 Criticism of Facebook Minor - Changed declarative voice to indicate the reality that it's an opinion.
1 July 2016
- 03:5703:57, 1 July 2016 diff hist −143 User talk:Cutterx2202 →Your edits against consensus: More cordial by not pointing out a hypocritical statement MrX made.
- 03:4503:45, 1 July 2016 diff hist −159 User talk:Cutterx2202 →July 2016
- 03:3703:37, 1 July 2016 diff hist −227 m User talk:Cutterx2202 →July 2016: Removed clutter.
- 03:3003:30, 1 July 2016 diff hist +812 User talk:Cutterx2202 No edit summary
- 03:0103:01, 1 July 2016 diff hist +2 m User talk:Cutterx2202 No edit summary
- 02:5702:57, 1 July 2016 diff hist +1 m User talk:Cutterx2202 →Your edits against consensus: Formatting
- 02:5502:55, 1 July 2016 diff hist −410 m Talk:Ex-gay movement →Scientific consensus on conversion therapy: found it.
- 02:5402:54, 1 July 2016 diff hist +15 Ex-gay movement Undid revision 727762140 by FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) There is not yet any citation for this claim, that is why there is a citation needed tag.
- 02:4802:48, 1 July 2016 diff hist +95 Talk:Ex-gay movement →Scientific consensus on conversion therapy
- 02:4602:46, 1 July 2016 diff hist +15 Ex-gay movement Undid revision 727761095 by Roscelese (talk) Content was not removed. Per talk, requesting citation instead. Now officially requesting action against Roscelese.
- 02:4202:42, 1 July 2016 diff hist −1,820 m User talk:Cutterx2202 No edit summary
- 02:3802:38, 1 July 2016 diff hist +15 Ex-gay movement Per talk page, instead of removing the unsourced claim, I am marking it as needing a citation.
- 02:3602:36, 1 July 2016 diff hist +3 m Talk:Ex-gay movement →Scientific consensus on conversion therapy: typo
- 02:3602:36, 1 July 2016 diff hist +318 Talk:Ex-gay movement →Scientific consensus on conversion therapy
- 02:3102:31, 1 July 2016 diff hist −1,375 User talk:Cutterx2202 →Your edits against consensus
- 02:2002:20, 1 July 2016 diff hist −36 Ex-gay movement Undid revision 727758331 by MrX (talk) Please stop trolling. I will suggest action taken if you revert again without a valid reason.
- 02:1102:11, 1 July 2016 diff hist −36 Ex-gay movement Undid revision 727748311 by MrX (talk) No verifiable proof there is a consensus. This also ignores the current state of affairs of news, politics, research, and general discourse on a broad scale. See Talk.
- 01:1301:13, 1 July 2016 diff hist +4 m Abortion →Abortion debate: Linking to definition here since it's relevant.
- 00:4900:49, 1 July 2016 diff hist −91 m Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Bucci →Parties: Extraneous to this article. The information may be found in PP's own page linked immediately prior, and the wording here is contentious.
- 00:3100:31, 1 July 2016 diff hist −36 Ex-gay movement Undid revision 721114517 by Roscelese (talk) : Roscelese was trolling based on his stated reasoning: "Not hotly debated among anyone serious." Will take further action if it continues.
21 May 2016
- 22:5222:52, 21 May 2016 diff hist −36 Ex-gay movement Undid revision 721114517 by RosceleseSaying "not hotly debated among anyone serious" as undo reason is not anywhere near objective, nor based in reality. There are many nations where it is a crime.
- 22:4722:47, 21 May 2016 diff hist −231 Kim Davis Undid revision 721109835 by Pjefts (talk). Failure to provide reason as to why a false statement is included as if it were true. Dubiously suspect.