User talk:Cutterx2202: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:57, 1 July 2016

Your edits against consensus

Four editors disagree with you removal of material from Ex-gay movement and not a single one supports your reasoning. You need to stop editing against consensus. If you have new sources to support your POV, present them on the talk page. Otherwise, please respect consensus.- Mr X 02:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The burden of proof is on the contributer to prove there is a scientific consensus and you/they have not done that other than simply saying there is one. Cutterx2202 (talk) 02:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Cutterx2202 reported by User:MrX (Result: ). Thank you. - Mr X 03:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Acroterion (talk) 03:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The block is as much for personal attacks in edit summaries as it was for the clear-cut edit-warring. Acroterion (talk) 03:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Cutterx2202 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Acroterion, you have accuse me of personal attacks yet provide not a single instance. As per an earlier request, I stopped trying to remove an unsourced claim and instead appropriately marked it as unsourced, which it is. I tried to resolve in talk, yet MrX and Rec.... kept trying to revert changes. Requesting unblock on the basis of being accused of personal attacks without explanation or example, and also taking action against the wrong party. Please completely review the facts of this situation before making hastey judgement. Cutterx2202 (talk) 03:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Acroterion, you have accuse me of personal attacks yet provide not a single instance.  As per an earlier request, I stopped trying to remove an unsourced claim and instead appropriately marked it as unsourced, which it is.  I tried to resolve in talk, yet MrX and Rec.... kept trying to revert changes.  Requesting unblock on the basis of being accused of personal attacks without explanation or example, and also taking action against the wrong party.  Please completely review the facts of this situation before making hastey judgement. [[User:Cutterx2202|Cutterx2202]] ([[User talk:Cutterx2202#top|talk]]) 03:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Acroterion, you have accuse me of personal attacks yet provide not a single instance.  As per an earlier request, I stopped trying to remove an unsourced claim and instead appropriately marked it as unsourced, which it is.  I tried to resolve in talk, yet MrX and Rec.... kept trying to revert changes.  Requesting unblock on the basis of being accused of personal attacks without explanation or example, and also taking action against the wrong party.  Please completely review the facts of this situation before making hastey judgement. [[User:Cutterx2202|Cutterx2202]] ([[User talk:Cutterx2202#top|talk]]) 03:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Acroterion, you have accuse me of personal attacks yet provide not a single instance.  As per an earlier request, I stopped trying to remove an unsourced claim and instead appropriately marked it as unsourced, which it is.  I tried to resolve in talk, yet MrX and Rec.... kept trying to revert changes.  Requesting unblock on the basis of being accused of personal attacks without explanation or example, and also taking action against the wrong party.  Please completely review the facts of this situation before making hastey judgement. [[User:Cutterx2202|Cutterx2202]] ([[User talk:Cutterx2202#top|talk]]) 03:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Four editors disagree with you removal of material from [[Ex-gay movement]] and not a single one supports your reasoning. You need to stop editing against consensus. If you have new sources to support your POV, present them on the talk page. Otherwise, please respect consensus.- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 02:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
-:I would bring up the hypocritical nature of your "consensus" message on homosexuality's (lack of) scientific consensus, but it doesn't seem like you'd get it.  The burden of proof is on you to prove there is a scientific consensus and you have not done that other than simply saying there is one.  [[User:Cutterx2202|Cutterx2202]] ([[User talk:Cutterx2202#top|talk]]) 02:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
+:The burden of proof is on  to prove there is a scientific consensus and you have not done that other than simply saying there is one.  [[User:Cutterx2202|Cutterx2202]] ([[User talk:Cutterx2202#top|talk]]) 02:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 == Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion ==