Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Shubinator

Username: Shubinator
First edit: Jan 07, 2009 22:58:22
Unique articles edited: 3,489
Average edits per page: 3.17
Total edits (including deleted): 11,043
Deleted edits: 218
Live edits: 10,825

Namespace totals
Article	       850	7.85%
Talk	      1866	17.24%
User	       314	2.90%
User talk     3223	29.77%
Wikipedia      813	7.51%
Wikipedia talk 422	3.90%
File	       115	1.06%
Template       419	3.87%
Template talk 2796	25.83%
Category	 5	0.05%
Portal	         2	0.02%

Month counts
2009/01	457	
2009/02	752	
2009/03	1700	
2009/04	2191	
2009/05	1713	
2009/06	770	
2009/07	808	
2009/08	808	
2009/09	857	
2009/10	247	
2009/11	212	
2009/12	310	

Logs
Accounts created: 1
Pages moved: 8
Pages patrolled: 1
Files uploaded: 1

Top edited articles
Article

    * 148 - Icos
    * 16 - Dendreon
    * 15 - Washington_University_in_St._Louis
    * 7 - BoardEx
    * 6 - Danforth_Campus
    * 5 - Rovelizumab
    * 5 - Stay-at-home_dad
    * 5 - Leandro_Barbosa
    * 4 - Zaira_Cosico
    * 4 - 2009_Monte-Carlo_Rolex_Masters


Talk

    * 15 - Main_Page
    * 6 - Icos
    * 3 - Icos/GA1
    * 3 - SM_UB-14
    * 2 - UAAP_Season_72
    * 2 - 2009_Malaysian_Grand_Prix
    * 2 - Pyramidenkogel
    * 2 - David_Shaw_(writer)
    * 2 - Scott_Williamson
    * 2 - Artemis_Fowl_(series)


User

    * 51 - Shubinator/DYKcheck.js
    * 31 - Shubinator/DYKcheck
    * 22 - Shubinator
    * 18 - Shubinator/Awards
    * 16 - Shubinator/monobook.js
    * 16 - Shubinator/Sandbox/Test_template
    * 13 - Shubinator/DYK_site_map
    * 13 - Shubinator/Header
    * 9 - Shubinator/Sandbox/Test_template_2
    * 9 - Shubinator/Sandbox/Template_Did_you_know


User talk

    * 285 - Shubinator
    * 82 - Royalbroil
    * 79 - Dravecky
    * 73 - Rjanag
    * 58 - Gatoclass
    * 53 - Orlady
    * 50 - Nerdseeksblonde
    * 46 - PFHLai/Archive_8
    * 46 - PeterSymonds
    * 37 - Daniel_Case


Wikipedia

    * 261 - Recent_additions
    * 78 - Main_Page/Errors
    * 24 - Sandbox
    * 17 - Administrators'_noticeboard
    * 17 - Featured_article_candidates/Icos/archive1
    * 15 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents
    * 12 - Did_you_know/Non-admin_participants
    * 12 - Did_you_know/Admins
    * 11 - Recent_additions/2004/July
    * 10 - Did_you_know/Guide


Wikipedia talk

    * 396 - Did_you_know
    * 7 - April_Fool's_Main_Page/Did_You_Know/Archive_2009
    * 5 - Sandbox
    * 4 - Requests_for_adminship
    * 2 - Featured_article_review
    * 2 - Did_you_know/Additional_rules
    * 1 - WikiProject_Pharmacology
    * 1 - Community_de-adminship/Draft_RfC
    * 1 - WikiProject_Artemis_Fowl
    * 1 - Requests_for_de-adminship


File

    * 5 - Icos_logo.png
    * 4 - Diam1.jpg
    * 3 - Picture_Imperfect.jpg
    * 3 - DYKcheck_screenshot.jpg
    * 2 - Nude_Wedding.jpg
    * 2 - NFS_Nitro_Wii_cover_art.jpg
    * 2 - Sockington_from_above.jpg
    * 2 - NRPSMarinCountyLine.jpg
    * 2 - Army_National_Guard_motorcycle_riders.jpg
    * 2 - DOCUTAH_2010_poster.jpg


Template

    * 228 - Did_you_know/Preparation_area_1
    * 119 - Did_you_know/Preparation_area_2
    * 18 - Did_you_know/Queue/LocalUpdateTimes
    * 6 - UpdatedDYK
    * 6 - Did_you_know/Clear
    * 4 - Dyktalk/doc
    * 3 - DYK_monthly_archive_nav
    * 2 - DYKAFnom
    * 2 - UpdatedDYKNom
    * 2 - Did_you_know/Queue/LocalUpdateTimes/Helper


Template talk

    * 2789 - Did_you_know
    * 5 - UpdatedDYK
    * 2 - DYK-Refresh


Category

    * 2 - DYK_images
    * 2 - DYK_files
    * 1 - Redundant_Wikipedia_files_for_speedy_deletion


Portal

    * 1 - Current_events/2009_July_24
    * 1 - Artemis_Fowl

WGB's oppose

edit
  1. Oppose If I can't be accepted then neither should you. From now on I will oppose anyone being nominated if I feel they are equally or less deserving than I am. You are less deserving than me, so no support for you. It's simple logic, since I was voted down. Otherwise the site is playing favorites and running a popularity contest and that must stop.Wiki Greek Basketball (talk) 07:09, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Struck inappropriate, pointy oppose. If anyone wants to revert me (not including Wiki Greek Basketball) feel free to do so. --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 08:29, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
    Looks like I am going to have to report you Coffee. You have gone out of your way to be rude and out of line and to overstep your bounds as it concerns me.Wiki Greek Basketball (talk) 08:53, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
    Well, such vote probably makes you feel better, but do you think it will help the project? Raising whatever standard we might have will end up in overload of presently active admins, with all the consequences. Materialscientist (talk) 07:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
    If I want your opinion I will ask for it. Like I said, I oppose and I stated why. I have no need to explain it or defend it to you.Wiki Greek Basketball (talk) 07:28, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
    "If you revert my edits again, and re-add that oppose, you will be blocked for at least 1 month. --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 08:53, 25 December 2009 (UTC)"Reply
    That is OUT OF LINE. I'm reporting this guy for abuse.Wiki Greek Basketball (talk) 08:55, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
    No WGB, it is YOU who is out of line here. Your oppose was struck because as Coffee said, it wasn't appropriate. Your RfA failed because of your holier-than-thou attitude, and it is not a good idea to keep pissing in the wrong pots. It is not fair for Shubinator to see your inappropriate attitude on their RfA. Coffee gave you pertinent advice, you should take it while you still can. ArcAngel (talk) 09:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
    Coffee is being an out of line, arrogant, pompous, jerk to me. This guy makes insulting remarks to me, breaks the site rules on civility by being uncivil exactly as it says not to on the site's rules. And this guy is an admin? What a joke. Not only that this guy goes out of his to attack my post on this RFA when HE COFFEE said much worse to me. I am 100% within my rights to vote oppose and broke NO RULES here and then this guy who is being very rude and is on a power trip has the audacity to threaten me on my talk page. Threatening me when HE is breaking site civility rules and has gone out of his way now to follow me and harass me. And to add insult to injury he has the gall to tell me I am not fit to be an admin? I am definitely going to report this guy.Wiki Greek Basketball (talk) 09:13, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
    No, WGB, it is you who are being uncivil... shockingly uncivil. You are essentially describing yourself in that last paragraph, not Coffee. You are being totally out of line... The Thing Merry Christmas 09:17, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
    Did you not see the crap Coffee said to me? How can this guy be an admin? This an outrage and a disgrace. You are defending this guy? Wikipedia site rules Wikipedia Incivility. Now you look at how this guy talked to me on my RFA. He BROKE site rules. Then he unfairly canceled out my oppose votes on two RFAs. I did NOTHING wrong and was totally within my rights on those oppose votes. Explain it to me. How come Coffee can BREAK site rules by being uncivil to me on my RFA but I cannot simply express my opinion (within site rules mind you) on another person's RFA without him canceling it and then threatening me on my talk page? Can you kindly explain this extreme double standard to me? I am sickened, disgusted, dismayed that someone like Coffee is an admin and I was voted down. UNREAL.Wiki Greek Basketball (talk) 09:24, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
    This is all becoming quite heated on your side... I suggest you take a bit of a break. Step away from the computer, and come back when you are calm, please... The Thing Merry Christmas 09:27, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
    Of course. I point out to you how Coffee was actually the one in the wrong and how you were applying a double standard to me and I have to back away from the computer. Is there a reason why you cannot simply treat me with the proper respect as I had been treating you?Wiki Greek Basketball (talk) 09:48, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

(out) I haven't read much, but after seeing this and reading WGB's RfA a few days ago I would suggest opening a thread at WT:RFA to see if he should be topic-banned from RfA-related pages. This sort of oppose is worse than DougsTech; at least DougsTech was not mean-spirited. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 17:44, 25 December 2009 (UTC) oops, I see this has already been discussed today at ANI. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 17:46, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply