Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Lucey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 13:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Lucey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nearly all the sources are offline, but from the headlines, they appear to be mostly notices. The only exception is the obituary in the Boston Globe, but if he were truly notable, where are the ones in other newspapers? Clarityfiend (talk) 13:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The Boston Globe archives are available on-line and I've added the links to the article. Without regard to the obit, there was SIGCOV in the Globe. E.g. [1], [2], [3]. Cbl62 (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Evaluating... some currently in the article do appear by title to be "transaction" or "notices" or "and finnaly" type articles. The sources that Cbl shows appear to be feature articles. I'm going with keep and passes WP:GNG based on additional sources provided above. It looks like he might be more remarkable for his civil service than sports... but press coverage is press coverage.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:31, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing that holds me back from taking a keep position is that the SIGCOV found so far is all from one newspaper. For a GNG pass, it would be best to have at least one other reliable, independent source with SIGCOV. Cbl62 (talk) 03:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep based on the sources provided by user:Cbl62. Clearly enough to pass WP:GNG Frank Anchor 03:30, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep he was a co-champion, I say he is important enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportsfangnome (talk • contribs) 13:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - passes GNG. Rlendog (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.