User talk:RAF910
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:55, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Wound ballistics diagrams
[edit]Hi -- the four wound ballistics diagrams you uploaded, File:M16 5.56x45mm wound ballistics.gif etc., were correctly attributed to Martin L. Fackler. However, they were missing all publication data, most importantly the year. The "date" slot is not for the date of your upload, it is supposed to date the thing you uploaded. The correct source information in this case would have been:
- "Wounding Patterns of Military Rifle Bullets", International Defense Review 22(1),1989, pp. 59-64.[1]
Please cite the sources for the material you upload.
Also, unfortunately, this means that there is a problem with your claim that the images are in the publc domain, as International Defense Review is a commercially published journal. Fackler may have been an "employee of the United States Government" in 1989, but it is not clear that his publication in this journal shold count as "work prepared as part of his official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code". In fact, I do not think it is likely that it should. I am not submitting the images for deletion at the moment to give you a chance to argue their status, but I do think that unfortunately they are hosted here in violation of either Fackler's or IHS Inc.'s copyright. --Dbachmann (talk) 09:11, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
This is good news. What you should do is, you should cite the 1987 date together with the Letterman Army Institute report as reference and this should be sufficient to establish that the images are indeed in the public domain in the US. Thank you, --Dbachmann (talk) 06:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- the "other versions" slot is for the same image hosted under a different filename on wikimedia; the original publication should just go under "source". Any additional information you may want to include can go into "description". --Dbachmann (talk) 15:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)