Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slaughterball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Even though NFT is not a csd category, article made no claim of notability, had no sources, and was of interest to only a small group in England. Be bold.— Ocatecir ^T 00:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slaughterball

WP:NOT — Wikipedia is not for something made up in school (or in the street) one day. The fact that it was made up as such is mentioned in the article itself. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 21:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete God I wish Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day was a speedy category. Improbcat 21:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If this is notable, my gym class thought of it first while playing dodgeball in 1970. Acroterion _(talk) 21:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That deserves a barnstar of Good Humor! Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 21:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, and I second User:Improbcat's wish for a WP:NFT-flavored speedy category. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 21:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — I have no idea if there's a proper place for proposing such a thing, but a CSD for things made up in school one day would be very helpful. Such things are never going to be notable, and are always going to be deleted. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 21:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete and I wholeheartedly third the WP:NFT speedy category idea. dtony 22:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete non notable silliness. Bigdaddy1981 22:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete and hit the creator in the head with a baseball, or something hard. Kwsn^(Ni!) 23:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.