Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Aroma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Air Aroma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This company does not meet WP:CORP. The article has no references, and there does not appear to be any significant secondary sources that point to the company's notability. Deli nk 12:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete A Google search was inconclusive. From the article itself, it looks like a nonnotable entity. Shalom ^Hello 13:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete: Apparently it is the "largest supplier of scent diffusion technology in the world"[1]. That was the only news item that showed up in Google. Not sure if that's enough for notability. → AA ^{(talk • contribs)} — 13:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 18:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete article hasn't improved since it was created as an internal directory. I removed a lot of junk but the original contributor hasn't been back.Garrie 00:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete, if another reference in addition to the one above can be found indicating notability, change to Weak Keep though. Lankiveil 10:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.