Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Women's Revelations Cup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Women's Revelations Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Further note: You can't just search on "Women's Revelations Cup" (in quotes) and expect to find it via google.com (which by the way filters what you can see based on your geographic location and search patterns). Try "Revelations Cup" and "women" or "Revelations Cup" and "FMF" and "2022" – it could also be because "Women's" doesn't parse well because of the apostrophe, etc. – you start to get a different set of results than if you only search with quotes or only search google.com. Cielquiparle (talk) 19:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


  • lens Review

checkY This article meet with neutral point of view of all countries in the tournament.
checkY This article was based only on information published in reliable sources (secondary sources and official web site for complemented).

Some topics are of interest only to some people, but since Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, articles that interest some people should be kept.

 Comment. This article should be kept. The article can be tagged for cleanup or attention, or improved through editing, but not for deletion.

Relates articles:
2022 Sud Ladies Cup
Revelations Cup
2022 SheBelieves Cup. Rey1996ss (talk) 17:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what's needed is some reliable sources in newspapers or websites for example. Wikipedia articles don't help, unfortunately. The good news is, Cielquiparle says there are sources and they are very good at finding them. Looks like they've already added some. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 19:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Some basic match reports do not infer notability. GiantSnowman 18:44, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman: I'm not sure I agree – what is a tournament, after all, if not a series of matches that are notable collectively? – but yes, there is also non-match-report coverage we can demonstrate, that makes the 2022 Women's Revelations Cup at least as notable as the men's Revelations Cup.
If there is some other criteria we should be following for tournaments specifically, or other type of coverage you are looking for, please let me know. Cielquiparle (talk) 20:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - This is an international friendly tournament obviously. If you need more references about Colombia holding the winner-tournament trophy click below:

Reference 1: Colombian Football Federation
Reference 2: onefootball.com
Reference 3: Fémina Fútbol Magazine
Reference 4: minuto30.com
Reference 5: Revelations Cup Mexico-Official Twitter
There was a little confussion - some people thought this wasn't real, or this wasn't a tournament. But this was the inaugural edition of the tournament, some people did not know about this tournament. There are many friendly-tournaments: SheBelievesCup, Toulon/Maurice Revello, or Arnold Clark Cup. The only difference is that this is U-17. In fact, the match ceremony was attended by members of the local government of León, Guanajuato.
Authorities for Mexican Football Federation and local government of León in the tournament award ceremony: click on 2:31:06
Colombia with the tournament champion trophy: 2:37:28 Rey1996ss (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. A lot of sources have been presented, just need some assurance they confer adequate notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

checkY The article should be keep This article confer notability WP:EVENT:

  1. The scope of reporting its national and international.
  2. The article were very widely covered in diverse sources: Television, sport magazines, newspapers, social media etc.
  3. The article is a precedent or catalyst for something else of lasting significance is likely to be notable.
  4. Its the inaugural edition for women's and there was 2 editions for men's: this does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable.
  5. A lot of sources have been presented: the event received significant coverage. There are secondary sources and principal/direct references as well.
  6. Diversity of sources, per above: Wikipedia's general notability guideline recommends that multiple sources be provided to establish the notability of a topic.
  7. The matches not be considered routine because this is a Tournament: at the end of the tournament was given: a troppy champion, top scorer award and fair play award. -That's the same situation in 2022 Sud Ladies Cup, that article it's a 4 U-20 teams tournament, the Women's Revelations Cup it's a 4 U-17 teams tournament, so both articles should be keep.Rey1996ss (talk) 00:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.