Stewards/elections 2010/votes/Corruptcopper

Corruptcopper talk · contribs · SULutil / stalktoy · globalcontribs · crosswiki-ness · confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

Questions: See Stewards/elections 2010/Questions#Corruptcopper

 Support I vote for him for a few reasons 1)He is fluent in many languages, that is key 2)pretty strong on contributions 3)young with potential plus resourcefulness and 4)his statement about the steward handbook, that should be a question for other candidates, I wonder if any of them even read it, it's good he's very knowledgeable of it. You have my support, may the force be with you. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rab777hp (talk)

Sorry, you are not eligible (no global account). --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 05:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well more than 1,000 edits and already ruled as eligible. If he had 10,000 edits I'd just assume that he'd turn into another power-seeking wikipedian. Excellent language skills.--Xania 01:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2. Go on then Chendy 10:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3. User:Juanjosemarin1 14:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Not enough experience. –Ejs-80 00:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2. I doubt the candidate has enough experience, --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 00:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4. Sorry, but I don't think you've enough experience. -Barras ^talk 00:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5. Obelix 00:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
6. Mr.Z-man 00:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
7. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
8. RP459 01:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
9. Sorry, you don't seem to be very involved in our wikis.  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
10. —§ stay (sic)! 01:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
11.  Oppose Insufficient experience, both cross-wiki and at home. --Shirik 01:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
12. You need more experience. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at ≈ 02:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
13. Octahedron80 03:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Wonder if this candidate fully understands the role of a steward.  fetchcomms☛ 03:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Sorry, you're ineligible--Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 14:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

14. Too young and too much, too much unexperience. Kubura 04:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    So what your saying is because I am 18 you don't feel that I am able to edit a perform steward tasks? I think that this is very rude of you to say such a thing. That gives me the impression that you think that everyone who edits the wikimedia wikis is old?? Corruptcopper 19:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

15.  Oppose Needed more cross-wiki edits. --MisterWiki 05:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
16. -MBK₀₀₄ 05:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
17. Clearly inexperienced in cw matters. Pmlineditor ∞ 07:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
18. More crosswiki experiences are needed, sorry. Of course, nothing against you. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 08:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
19. Tiptoety ^talk 08:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
20. Vyk 09:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
21. --WizardOfOz ^talk 10:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
22. --Treublatt 10:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    cassius1213 10:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

23. --KTo288 10:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
24. Not this time. More cross-wiki experience is needed — NickK 11:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
25. Not enough experience. --Erwin 12:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
26. Not a sysop in any of the Wikimedia wikis. -- Tofra ^Talk _{contributions} 13:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
27. Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates as a form of protest against open balloting. Riffic 13:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
28. not enough crosswiki experience # --MF-W 14:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
29. dito --Quedel 16:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
30. Not enough experience at this time. Continue working in different projects and maybe you'll get there one day. 1ForTheMoney 16:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
31. Clearly not enough experience as a contributor. Furthermore, I can't really trust a steward with no sysop experience, sorry. VonTasha 18:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
32. Unexperience.--Alex Esp 21:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
33. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 21:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
34. Woudloper 23:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC) doesn't need steward rights to do good work[reply]
35. --თოგო ^(D) 00:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
36. --Lucas Nunes 00:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
37. Miyagawa 09:32, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
38. --junafani 10:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
39. per above --FiliP ██ 11:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
40. Fruggo 14:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Not enough experience.[reply]
41. --Julius1990 17:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
42. Not convinced. And the English text (en-N!) doesn't convince me of exceptional language skills... • Lirion (Λιριων, Лирион, ليريون) ^wtf? • 17:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
43. Needs more experience. I also echo the language concern from Lirion. bibliomaniac15 21:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
44. NellieBly 01:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC) per Lirion.[reply]
45. per above. Razorflame 07:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
46. summated sufficiently above billinghurst sDrewth 12:05, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
47. --FollowTheMedia 22:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
48. --Vigorous action 04:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
49. Not enough experience, plus the childish opposition to several other candidates shows a lack of maturity. PeterSymonds 16:18, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
50. --SUL 16:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
51.  Oppose per PeterSymonds. --Jorunn 16:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. positiv: Languages, negative: too young in my opinion for such a job. Marcus Cyron 11:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2. A Stop at Willoughby 19:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 20:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4. moral support but imho not yet ready for this. oscar 21:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]