Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Vectorman, Vector Man and Vector-Man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. — LrdChaos 20:16, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At this time, these pages are identical. The pages seem to be intended to be quotes from the videogame Vectorman, which has a decent Wikipedia page, but none of the quotes on the page are remotely memorable or worth including (granted, including lots of non-memorable quotes is a problem for many of the other video game pages here as well, but those usually just need to have those trimmed out, leaving the quotes that are unique to the game). —LrdChaos 14:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Vote closed. Result: delete (seven votes to delete, no dissent). —LrdChaos 20:16, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. —LrdChaos 14:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "Vectorman" unless the unoriginal quotes are removed and legitimate, non-trivial quotes are added. If so, redirect "Vector Man" to it; otherwise, delete "Vector Man", too. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 14:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also delete or redirect "Vector-Man" per above. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 17:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Jeff. If the article is improved, redirect the duplicate article Vector-Man to it as well as Vector Man. -- Robert 14:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There is yet another page, Vector-Man, which I have now added to this nomination for deletion. - InvisibleSun 15:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all three. 121a0012 21:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete 'em all and let God sort 'em out - If this is the game I'm thinking of, you're not going to get any worthwhile quotes from it. - Koweja 02:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all three, unless valid quotes can be found. If so, consolidate onto one page and add redirects. ~ UDScott 13:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.