Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nico Yennaris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all per WP:SNOW. This blocked user has used sockpuppet accounts to create and recreate articles about non-notable footballers. As they all fail to meet the GNG they will be deleted. Woody (talk) 00:03, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nico Yennaris

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, no reason given though. Youth footballer who fails WP:ATHLETE as he has yet to appear in a fully-professional competition. Also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of any significant media coverage. --Jimbo^[online] 09:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they too fail the same criteria:

Comment All these articles created by same user who appears to be a SOCK of a blocked user who created multiple non-notable (typically reserve/youth team) player articles, and then, after initial articles were deleted largely as "no appearance" ATHLETE failures he began adding false appearance information to info boxes. User ignored all advice and attempts to communicate. I haven't had a proper look at all of them yet, but a quick glance shows very much similar MO. Shame really, potentially could have been a good contributor if handled differently.--ClubOranje^T 12:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. More of the same, sadly. Not one of them passes either WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG. These can probably be speedied under CSD G5. Alzarian16 (talk) 12:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. I've just removed copyvio of the various clubs' website profiles from each of them, so there's not much text left in any, and some of that is invented. None has played in a fully-pro competition, despite what it claims in the articles. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Fails WP:ATHLETE JeremyMcClean (talk) 18:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - fail WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 18:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. None of them passes either WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG Steve-Ho (talk) 23:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.