Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Godvliet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Godvliet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy contested, but it's way out of my league. Pun intended. Elevating for discussion. delete UtherSRG (talk) 12:25, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. -- UtherSRG (talk) 12:27, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't pass wp:athlete. Per WP:Athlete you should play at a professional level, and Bruce, has, helas, only played at an amateurial level. In particular doesn't pass Wikipedia:NSPORT#Football_.28soccer.29 --_Sulmues^{Let's talk} 13:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails ATHLETE. Fails GNG with no independent coverage outside of general sports journalism as expected from low level local players. Not part of enduring annals of history.--ClubOranje^T 09:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 21:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 21:18, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. --JonBroxton (talk) 03:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.