Jump to content

User talk:67.161.42.199

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.161.42.199 (talk) at 01:23, 2 October 2005 (→‎Rude conduct). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

You've made many solid edits and improved a number of articles. Hope to see you stay. Please consider getting an account. Jonathunder 18:56, 2005 May 8 (UTC)

Your edit to Ellen Makkai

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view is absolute and non-negotiable. Please familiarize yourself with NPOV policy. Ellen Makkai may well be a whacko, in your opinion and in mine. But Pol Pot and Adolf Hitler were substantially less savory characters than Ellen Makkai, and we strive for neutrality on their articles too. Thanks. —Caesura(t) 04:40, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Refrain from Personal Insults

Thankyou for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please refrain from making personal attacks. See No Personal Attacks if you would like guidance following this policy.An An 07:03, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Just a word of thanks for some of your work

I noticed and appreciated your contributions recently, just thought I'd let you know :) Sherurcij 04:04, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Inflammatory language

I've noticed some of your edits, and agree with most of your sentiments. However, I think the best way to make a point is to lay out the facts in an objective a way as possible. If you are correct in your assessment, most intelligent readers will reach the same conclusion. Inflammatory language often alienates the very same people who can be convinced by NPOV. Aside from being a waste of your time because it will be quickly reverted, it is counter productive to your goals. -- Samuel Wantman 07:46, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jemaah Islamiyah

Please read the passage in Jemaah Islamiyah that you edited more carefully. "Conservative" was being used to refer to the Indonesian Darul Islam movement, NOT Jemaah Islamiyah. The basis for your change (that conservative Muslims do not "glorify suicide") doesn't even apply since the Darul Islam movement never did so (e.g., never used suicide bombing). --Daniel 13:09, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

Rude conduct

When communicating with other users, such as at User talk:71.240.180.100, always be civil. Remember: WP:NPA and WP:CIV. Thank you. –ArmadniGeneral (talkcontribs) 00:29, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I told a vandal to grow up. Do you have a problem with that?