Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.181.62.180 (talk) at 07:17, 27 July 2008 (→‎Criteria). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The In the News (ITN) section on the Main Page features up-to-date encyclopedic content reflecting important international current events. This page describes the inclusion criteria for ITN, as well as the procedure to place an item. ITN supports the central purpose of Wikipedia—making a great encyclopedia. ITN items (also known as "blurbs" or "hooks") link to encyclopedia articles that have been updated to reflect an important current event; it does not act as a newspaper, nor does it link to news articles.

Wikipedia is not an online newspaper and does not accept original works of journalism or first-hand reports. However, many Wikipedians are motivated to create and update encyclopedic articles of timely interest. Because Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, it does a much better job with such entries than a "dead tree" encyclopedia. ITN originated in the September 11, 2001 attacks, when entries were created and put on the Main Page within minutes of the attacks. The entries led to an infusion of interest by editors in creating a section on the Main Page, which linked to articles providing readers the context behind the news.

Criteria

Candidates for ITN are evaluated on two main grounds: the quality of the updated content and the significance of the developments described in the updated content. In many cases, qualities in one area can make up for deficiencies in another. For example, a highly significant event, such a the discovery of a cure for cancer, may have a sub-par update associated with it, but be posted anyway with the assumption that other editors will soon join in and improve the article. Conversely, an editor may write an in-depth update on a topic normally considered marginal, thus convincing commenters that it is deserving of inclusion. Note that the former may outweigh the latter, i.e. it would be rather silly to post an update about a relatively obscure topic on the same day that a cure for cancer was discovered just because the other topic had been researched thoroughly. A successful nomination will normally go through several procedural steps before being placed on the ITN template.

Updated content

Each blurb on ITN contains an emboldened link to an article for which cited updates have been provided. Changes in verb tense (e.g. "is" → "was") or updates that convey little or no new information beyond what is stated in the In the news blurb are insufficient. The decision as to when an item is updated 'enough' is subjective, but a five sentence update (with several references) has generally been considered more than sufficient, while a one sentence update is considered extremely questionable. In the case of new event-specific articles, the traditional cutoff for 'enough' has been around three complete, referenced and well-formed paragraphs.

Updated content must be thoroughly referenced. As with all Wikipedia articles, citations must be to reliable sources. While articles in topics such as sporting events and economics lend themselves to tables of numbers, updates must be at least in part written in prose to qualify for ITN consideration.

Articles that are subject to serious issues, as indicated by 'orange'- or 'red'-level article tags, will not normally be accepted for an emboldened link.

Significance

Unlike the TFA and Did you know sections of the Main Page, ITN rejects items deemed trivial. The criterion was previously written as "a story of international importance or interest". This standard is highly subjective and the focus of much of the disagreement over particular candidates. The most common form of opposition on this ground is that the news is "too local" and not of interest to people in the commenter's country of origin.

Procedural

  1. There is a sufficiently updated article, cited to credible sources.
  2. A blurb conforming to the style guide is listed at Portal:Current events or one of its subpages
  3. The item has been nominated at the candidates' page, with an emboldened link to the updated article. A freely-licensed image to accompany the item may be suggested.

Special cases

Deaths

The death criteria are contested and under discussion here.

The deaths of prominent individuals have historically been the most contentious candidates for ITN and the vast majority of deaths will not be placed on the template. All deaths, including for notable individuals who still lack an article, may be placed on Recent deaths. There are multiple death listings every day. A fraction of those individuals, who also have Wikipedia articles, will be placed on the sidebar of Portal:Current events, which normally will cover deaths of prominent individuals over the past two weeks or so.

The editors maintaining Portal:Current events are diligent about keeping individual deaths out of the daily items of the portal proper, and in the areas designated for those listings. On certain rare occasions, a death will be so significant that it will allowed to be listed along with regular news items at Portal:Current events. If, and only if, a death listing appears to be surviving on Portal:Current events can it be listed as a candidate for ITN.

Deaths that have been posted on ITN generally fall into one of two categories: persons whose deaths caused significant events that were themselves sufficiently notable enough for ITN (notable person+notable death) and persons who were so influential in life that resistance to their ITN posting was futile (extremely notable person+mundane death). An example of the former is John Garang, former Sudanese rebel leader and vice-president, whose sudden death prompted widespread rioting and threatened to destabilize the peace agreement ending the national civil war. Examples of the latter include Pope John Paul II and former U.S. presidents Ronald Reagan and Gerald Ford. It is generally agreed that the mundane deaths of individuals of 'normal' notability are not worthy of mention on ITN.

Sports and other recurring events

Certain regularly recurring events are considered of sufficient interest to be placed on ITN every time they occur. These are mostly sporting events and a proposed list of sporting events for automatic approval has been written at Wikipedia:Sports on ITN. Discussions on proposed inclusions and removals should take place on the talk page there.

Other recurring events that have repeatedly been included include the awarding of the various Nobel Prizes, Fields Medal, Man Booker Prize, Man Booker International Prize, the Academy Award for best picture, and the winner of the Eurovision Song Contest. A list of non-sports recurring events for ITN has not yet been created.

Recognition

The article, article's updater(s), and the ITN/C nominator may be recognized as contributing to ITN through the credit templates posted by ITN on user talk pages. When an article is first nominated for ITN, the hook may be followed by (i) 'article updated by XXX; nom by YYY' or (ii) 'self-nom.' These help ITN determine which user talk pages to post credits.

The following templates are used to credit the article creator and the article nominator as well as give notice on the article talk page that the article appeared on the Main Page:

  • Article creator's talk page: ({{UpdatedITN}}) {{subst:UpdatedITN|21 September|2024|Article name}} --~~~~
  • Nominator's talk page: ({{UpdatedITNNom}}) {{subst:UpdatedITNNom|21 September|2024|Article name}} --~~~~
  • Article talk page: ({{ITNtalk}}) {{ITNtalk|21 September|2024}} (check if small style templates in use, if so add small=yes parm)

Users may also place the userbox-formatted {{User In the News Contributor}} on their userpage.

Notes for administrators

Flooding in Kłodzko, Poland
Flooding in Kłodzko, Poland

view - page history - related changes - Edit (admins only) - Suggestions

Evaluating candidates

Whether or not a candidate meets the criteria for updated content and significance will often be immediately apparent. If you question the quality of the update, explain this so the nominator has a chance to improve the article. If you have a question about the significance, the best course of action is normally to postpone posting to allow other users to comment. Blurbs that result in discussion deadlocking in no consensus may be posted. In cases where there are multiple candidates, admins may choose to skip candidates lacking consensus. Otherwise, waiting until the timer (described below) notes that 24 hours has passed before posting may be advisable.

Check legitimacy

Before adding an item to ITN, use the given citations to check that news story is legit. If you feel that the supporting media source is dubious or does not support the wording of the suggested blurb, please investigate further before putting possibly erroneous content on the Main Page.

*mp and chronological order

For technical reasons, precede every blurb with the invisible template {{*mp}}, including the date of the event described, e.g. {{*mp|April 1}}. Items are placed chronologically according to the event they describe, not chronologically according to the order they were placed on the template. For example, if there was a template with one item from April 1st, 2 from April 2nd, 1 from April 4th and 1 from April 5th, and an admin wished to place an item for an event that occurred on April 3rd, it would enter as the fourth item in the template. In cases where there are multiple items for the same date, normal procedure is for the most recently posted item to go on top of the date sub-queue, though admins are encouraged to place clearly more significant items higher in the template, thus ensuring that they remain longer.

Blurbs on similar topics and updates to blurbs

In cases where a blurb is suggested when there is an existing blurb on the same country or topic, the newest blurb will generally replace the older blurb. Alternately, the blurbs may be combined if they mesh well.

When significant updates are made to blurbs - always supported by the emboldened article - admins may reset items higher up the template.

Length of template

Ideally, the left and right sides of the Main Page of Wikipedia should be symmetrical, i.e. the ITN section should be roughly the same height as the section for Today's featured article. Each person will have a slightly different sense of when this occurs, depending on computer screen size, screen resolution, font size settings, etc, though it will not vary greatly among users using 'standard' settings. When ITN grows longer than TFA, the oldest item is removed. If the TFA is longer than ITN, the addition of new items are expedited, older items are re-added, or the sister Selected anniversaries and Did you know templates are adjusted so the TFA-DYK and ITN-SA columns are roughly equal. Depending upon the length of each ITN blurb and the length of the TFA, ITN will normally consist of four to seven items, as well as one image.

In practice, a small number of admins, generally one or two, will take on the informal responsibility of Main Page balancing. In the interests of preventing endless reverting adjustments, Main Page regulars generally submit to the edits of the 'balancers', even if those edits end up making the balance marginally worse on their own screen. If you don't already know who the balancers are, check out the recent history of ITN and DYK, generally considered the most dynamic Main Page templates, to see who is handling the fine-tuning.

Main Page: Updates and Caching

The Main Page does not necessarily update immediately after Template:In the news is changed. In order to purge the cache of the Main Page so that the present version appears, click this link: //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge

Images

  1. One and only one image shall be included on Template:In the news at any one time. The width and height shall not exceed 100px. It shall be right-justified and have alt text. #*This is accomplished by enclosing the image code in <div style="float:right"> </div> and adding |100x100px| followed by the alt text inside the image code. For example: <div style="float:right">[[Image:Example.jpg|100x100px|example image]]</div>. The use of the "|right" extended image markup should be avoided, as under the current MediaWiki parser, it results in unsightly and asymmetrical white borders around images in the green main page column.
  2. Before placing an image in the template, ensure that its copyright is well-documented and that it is legal for it to be displayed on the Wikipedia. Avoid using fair use images. Instead, find a related free image (PD, GFDL, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, etc.) as an alternative.
  3. Before updating Template:In the news with a new image, protect that image and add {{Mprotected}} to the image's description page. If you have uploaded a temporary copy from Commons, use {{C-uploaded}} or {{M-cropped}}, making sure you also copy the author attribution and the licence tag). Administrators who are also administrators on Commons may protect images there, tagging them with {{En main page}}. See commons:User:Zzyzx11/En main page for relevant info. (Commons protection will prevent local uploads.)
  4. When using images, parenthetically note in italicized text that the mentioned item is pictured. Example: "...leader José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero (pictured right) is sworn in..." If the image depicts something related to or representative of the subject (but not the subject itself), the indication should be qualified accordingly [e.g. (map of epicenter pictured)].
  5. Unprotect the old image that is being removed, or speedy delete it if it has been temporarily uploaded. When deleting, don't forget to immediately check the deleted history of its image description page and restore any relevant Wikipedia-specific edits, category links, and tags (such as {{FeaturedPicture}}) that were on there beforehand.

Timer

ITN has in the past been subject to criticism for its tendency to stagnate. The addition of a new ITN blurb every 24 hours will normally result in a complete template turnover in 5-7 days. To maintain this minimum level of turnover, the timer at Template:In the news/Next update/Time will turn yellow 24 hours after the last update to encourage editors to suggest new items and admins to evaluate candidates. After posting a new item, reset the timer. Template:In the news/Next update/Time