User talk:Chris388: Difference between revisions
Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Pierre Trudeau. (TW) |
→Trudeau: new section |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''[[User:Citobun|Citobun]]''' ([[User_talk:Citobun|talk]]) 18:48, 23 January 2016 (UTC) |
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''[[User:Citobun|Citobun]]''' ([[User_talk:Citobun|talk]]) 18:48, 23 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Trudeau == |
|||
Hi! You might want to take a look at some of those links above from the welcome message. As well, your recent edits seem to be going against consensus, so you should take them to the talk page of the article. There are quite a few policies and guidelines around here, so it takes time to learn. Thanks. [[User:Dbrodbeck|Dbrodbeck]] ([[User talk:Dbrodbeck|talk]]) 18:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:49, 23 January 2016
Welcome!
Hi Chris388! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
January 2016
Your recent editing history at Pierre Trudeau shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Citobun (talk) 18:48, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Trudeau
Hi! You might want to take a look at some of those links above from the welcome message. As well, your recent edits seem to be going against consensus, so you should take them to the talk page of the article. There are quite a few policies and guidelines around here, so it takes time to learn. Thanks. Dbrodbeck (talk) 18:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)