User talk:KillerChihuahua: Difference between revisions

24 - 23 - 22 - 21 - 20 -19 - 18 -17 - 16 -15 - 14 -13 -12 -11 - 10 - 9 - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 -4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Archives

Thought you might want to chime in on this. Cheers! Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 01:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you had replied at Wikipedia talk:Editing policy#Ad hominem editing?, while you were replying, I was posting more of the timeline and specifics at User talk:Dennis Brown#Continued disruption by socks of a user you blocked - feel free to review. Basically, it's a user who was blocked for disruptive editing and trolling, who is continuing their wikilawyersing on multiple talk pages. Their claim of an "improvement" was actually a policy proposal to allow them to claim their talk page rant should not have been deleted. My personal belief is that all their existing threads should either be deleted or collapsed under WP:DFTT. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information - I suspected such might be the case, but wasn't certain. KillerChihuahua^?!? 16:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for your message.

The link is: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001

Regards, --cgersten 19:44, 7 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgersten (talk • contribs)

You need to take that information to the talk page of the article where you want to add it, and start a new post and say what you want to add and that you will be using this as the source, and discuss it with the editors there. This is the wrong place to put this. KillerChihuahua^?!? 19:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KillerChihuahua. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 04:24, 30 September 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Activism1234 04:24, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, read and replied. KillerChihuahua^?!? 12:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I havnt been to the 'evolution' page in a long time? Can you read dates? Stop posting garbage to my wall or i will start doing it to you. Jinx69 (talk) 15:25, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Check the history; I didn't post that. Someone else did,[1] you removed it, then several editors in turns reverted you,[2][3][4] and I reverted back[5] to YOUR version WITHOUT the warning. Take your time. Check it carefully. KillerChihuahua^?!? 15:37, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Killer Chihuahua,

I was the one to suggest to an admin to look into Fut.Perf.'s history[6][7][8] before Fut.Perf. opened the AE case. So, I also brought my initial grievance to AE. I changed the "lied". JCAla (talk) 16:47, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And yet that has absolutely nothing at all to do with the issue at hand, which is that you incorrectly opened a duplicate case on AE with the names reversed. This is inappropriate, regardless of who bitched, whined, complained, or asked for help about the other editor first. If you were the Archangel Gabriel and the other editor were Azazel, then you still don't open a second case. All parties' actions are examined, and all are open to sanctions, including the one who opened the case. This is clearly stated on the AE page. Please read the big pink box on the top of the page carefully.

Good call on changing "lied". However, it should not have been necessary, and should have been done because you realized it was inappropriate when it was pointed out to you, not because it was "requested"[9] KillerChihuahua^?!? 16:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]