User talk:Prakashpanwar: Difference between revisions

Hello, Prakashpanwar! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! My76Strat 18:37, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I want to start some articles which were deleted. I think i can improve them and make them live along with powerful references. I think some articles which were deleted were of some use. Prakashpanwar (talk) 18:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Try reading the page Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted?. Even though it is aimed at the authors of deleted pages, the advice and actions there are what you need. -- John of Reading (talk) 19:41, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You uploaded a file with the name AAM.jpg but unfortunately there was already a file with that name - a quite different image which was in use in the article All-American Murder. I've reverted your error but you might want to check, please, for filename conflicts before you try again so that your upload doesn't cause problems. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 17:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• PS If you sign talk page messages with four tildes like this: ~~~~ it will automatically insert name and date when you save it, and make talk page readers happier! :)

A tag has been placed on Dr Prithviraj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 19:21, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Dr Prithviraj, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 20:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr.Paste, u reverted the article editing by me and all the link/references and extra things got deleted. I dont have the back up of it. Kindly restore it and then place the tag again. I will not re-type again and again. Thanks. Prakashpanwar (talk) 20:32, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• The article has already been deleted as non notable. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 20:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-written the article with necessary references and as per the A7, and specified the importance of the subject in the article itself. Though, if you want you can suggest in this respect, so that I will try to correct the same. Thanks Prakashpanwar (talk) 06:13, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I choosed the wrong license will uploading the picture. I will now keep this thing in mind to select the most appropriate License before uploading. Thanks for the intimation. Prakashpanwar (talk) 16:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biba Singh.jpg was from the subject's Facebook page. You claimed it was your own. Unless you are yourself Ms Biba Singh, or her webmaster, this photograph wasn't your own. This was again a copyright violation. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:48, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This picture .i.e Biba Singh.jpg was used with permission of her sought at Facebook page of her. You can inbox her to enquire her yourself.This is the second time, if I do an infringement let all responsibility be mine. Anyways thanks for the intimation. Prakashpanwar (talk) 21:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to upload a photo from somebody else with their permission, you need to document that permission by forwarding their message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia.org". It needs to explicitly specify that the author is releasing the image under a free license such as cc-by-sa; a mere permission "for use on Wikipedia" is not enough. Never upload such items simply claiming they are your own. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:05, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Prakashpanwar, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

A tag has been placed on R. H. Sankhala, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 07:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. H. Sankhala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. H. Sankhala (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 06:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it if its as per the Wikipedia policies to delete it. What I know about notability is that notability of researcher is through his published works and as per my knowledge, Journals etc normally do not cite references of a research paper by a non-notable person. If these are the Wikipedia policies, delete it immediately. And if you are considering to do a discussion, firstly cite all the sources which were added by me and other people, as I fetched them with a lot of hard work. Thanks Prakashpanwar (talk) 17:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]