Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Suspected sockpuppets: Add suspicious IPs |
Added IPs |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
This mornings find.... So far *sigh* --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 06:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
This mornings find.... So far *sigh* --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 06:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] </span>====== |
|||
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##--> |
|||
Added 3 IPs using typical POV and language at E&E. Two look like the same user even without much digging into network allocations, the third is different but the same. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 17:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
||
Revision as of 17:50, 3 February 2010
Scibaby
- Scibaby (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.
Report date February 3 2010, 06:51 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- Restline (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Phudrie (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by KimDabelsteinPetersen
This mornings find.... So far *sigh* --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 06:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz
Added 3 IPs using typical POV and language at E&E. Two look like the same user even without much digging into network allocations, the third is different but the same. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 17:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status –
Endorsed for Checkuser attention. Requested by Kim D. Petersen (talk) 06:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed SpitfireTally-ho! 09:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)