User talk:Ioeth: Difference between revisions

This is Ioeth's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 7 days

Your suggestions are welcome here. Thanks ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ _―Œ ^{♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣} 04:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ioeth - did you mean to remove all three of these reports from UAA [1]? Edit summary suggests you only intended to remove the top one. Cassandra 73 (talk) 18:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I did not mean to remove all of those reports. I knew I should have checked the page history after that edit, because when I made the edit I was very surprised that the other reports did not show up, but I just figured that the helper bot must have removed them. Would you like to check on restore them or should I? Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 19:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They're still unblocked so I've re-reported them. Cassandra 73 (talk) 19:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks muchly, and keep up the great work! Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 19:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Will do. Thanks. Athenean (talk) 21:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

but you may regret having welcomed me, I'm someone who is not welcome to edit. I should be blocked not welcomed. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Papabu (talk • contribs) 19:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I will not regret it. As I said in my reply to you on 517design's talk page, I will assume good faith until it's proven otherwise. I did notice that you jumped right into a highly contentious topic area, obviously with knowledge of an experienced editor. Could you share with me why you are not welcome to edit? If you're not comfortable doing that here, you can find my contact information on my user page. Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 19:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For someone who is assuming good faith, you are assuming good faith just more than you should. I had some free time to kill so I did kill that time but won't have it so I'll stop contributing. I won't mess around more, there are already just too much socks, I guess that seems as an admission, which it is. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Papabu (talk • contribs) 19:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

btw, the task force recommendations regarding the accessibility of wikipedia in China is interesting. Is it for ethical reasons, as in right to access or expend Wikipedia to 1/4 of world population who has no access to it. Is Wikipedia actually proposing to brake a countries right to decide what they allow as information? I make no judgement, but it's still an interesting subject.