User talk:Dusti/Userpage: Difference between revisions

I just switched names and did this--Stephenharper321  Talk 

but how do i make my own?

Do you by any chance have Norwegian connections? In Norwegian, your username almost sounds like "stupid in the head". Quite amusing, isnt it? Haha!

Expand tags on stub articles are redundant. Every stub has implicitely to be expanded.Afil (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 1904 Ethereal defense of Germany, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 141.199.102.30 (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What could it be kept for? No offense, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and that was utter, bleeding nonsense. Glad the battle turned out OK, as my my dad came from Germany, though maybe it would have averted WWI? At any rate, that would be better suited for Uncyclopedia. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 18:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ack! History?! Magical invaders defeated in a major battle of earth shaking proportions?! In which the decisive strategic move was using a Dragon?!! I'm as gullible as the next man, but really. Dlohcierekim 18:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

come again? Dlohcierekim 18:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. A totally made up battle involving D & D participants and a a German gymnast? Or am I missing something? Dlohcierekim 18:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you feel that way. Not once have you given me a valid reason to not see that page as nonsense. For instance, if you had said, "This is a fictional battle from such and such a story line, with verifiable sources here, here, and here," that would have been a different story. Tell you what, I'll restore the article and list it at AFD. Dlohcierekim 19:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/January 2008#Dustihowe. RFRBot (talk) 19:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You recently warned me to to not vandalize WP. I agree that I should not vandalize it. However, I do not I agree with the fact that I did vandalize it. All I did was create a monobook.js page. I actually created this account so I could do specifically that (for I am not one hundred percent confident in my abilities to edit the code. I didn't know if I would be able to change it afterward or not). Can you explain to me where I did something wrong? Also, it would be helpful to learn how to clear my cace :). Thank you. TestDummyTommy (talk) 20:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your appreciation regarding the AfDs related to the Franco-Mongol alliance (especialy Mongol alliances in the Middle-East). A few editors are actually putting a lot of efforts into deleting a lot of the referenced material from the Franco-Mongol alliance page (all from reputable and published sources) in favour of a highly restrictive and dismissive point of view. Your support is appreciated. Best regards. PHG (talk) 11:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]