Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
#{{admin|Seicer}} |
#{{admin|Seicer}} |
||
:— [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 03:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC) |
:— [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 03:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC) |
||
::Note, it appears Sebastiankessel is the first admin that will be impacted by the new "5 year" rule as well. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 03:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:45, 6 March 2018
|
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.
The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.
This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.
If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.
To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.
RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AirshipJungleman29 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 90 | Open | 21:54, 3 October 2024 | 6 days, 22 hours | no | report |
It is 23:16:57 on September 26, 2024, according to the server's time and date. |
Change to the inactivity policy
A proposed change to the administrator inactivity policy has been approved by the community. Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA. Bureaucrats will need to check the logs of anyone requesting a resysop on the bureaucrats' noticeboard (or elsewhere) to ensure they meet the new requirements. 28bytes (talk) 07:28, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikipedia:Inactive_administrators/2018#March_2018 administrators are being desysoped due to inactivity. Thank you for your service.
- Gogo Dodo (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Sebastiankessel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Pb30 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Rspeer (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- SoLando (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Seicer (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- — xaosflux Talk 03:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note, it appears Sebastiankessel is the first admin that will be impacted by the new "5 year" rule as well. — xaosflux Talk 03:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC)