User talk:Mattisse: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:44, 15 January 2010

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report

No RfXs since 08:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC).—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online}

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

If you post on my talk page I will answer it here. Please keep any posts short and concise. And please do not carry on conversations with other editors on this page. Any such conversations will be removed. Thanks!

Anyone who has problems with my editing is encouraged to post at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Alerts.

Archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

DYK hook is too long

Hello, Mattisse. You have new messages at CeeGee's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Happy New Year

Keep warm, keep well. SilkTork *^YES! 16:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Eve GA

This user helped promote Arthur Eve to good article status.

Thanks for your involvement in the development of Arthur Eve which has become a WP:GA in recent months. --TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and congratulations! Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 00:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:I changed you dyk hook - please check

Yeah, that works. Thanks. The Flash ^{talk} 16:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Dell Alexander

I've fixed the sourceing issue. For the DYK hook.--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 11:41, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK hook on Mashallah Shamsolvaezin

Thanks for shortening it, it looks great! I linked to some sources about Shamsolvaezin editing newspapers, and added that fact back in. CordeliaNaismith (talk) 22:20, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

World War II

Hey Mattisse, I noticed you transcluded the GA review at Talk:World War II. It's actually already transcluded further up on the page, so I've undone yours. Thanks anyways though! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 00:51, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Sorry about that! Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 00:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Beautiful Eyes GA

Hi! I didn't want to review the article, I just wanted to give my thoughts on it. Candyo32 (talk) 02:44, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 Hey Mattisse, I noticed you transcluded the GA review at [[Talk:World War II]]. It's actually already transcluded further up on the page, so I've undone yours. Thanks anyways though! Cheers, [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 00:51, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 :OK. Sorry about that!  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
+==Re:Beautiful Eyes GA ==
+Hi! I didn't want to review the article, I just wanted to give my thoughts on it. [[User:Candyo32|Candyo32]] ([[User talk:Candyo32|talk]]) 02:44, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Peer reviews with no or minimal feedback

October 26 Campbell's Soup Cans May 2 Nuclear clock May 25 Nodoroc June 24 Michael Biggs July 18 Henry Clay Work September 8 Tetris (NES video game) September 12 Elm Farm Ollie September 15 Chinese Garden MRT station
If your review is not in the list of unanswered reviews, you can add it.
v t e