InNeed95

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InNeed95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been unblocked indef by User:El_C. The reason was "Edit-Warring". Hilarious. I didnt. Though it is understandable, why a person might think of it. I indeed did the same edit as prior to my recent block. Though I did it with caution. I requested that the user who reverted the Edit to join the TP. I only did that once. I did not look forward for additional edits. 1 Actually, I assumed that the reverter would revert the edit again. I wanted to use that non-cooperation behaviour (the edit) in a "protection request", "requesting for dispute solution" or starting a "noticeboard discussion".. etc.. Though now, this I am unable to do so. --InNeed95 (talk) 13:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You were absolutely edit warring; there is no other way to describe your actions here. Since you fail to acknowledge this, I am declining this request. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add on

Latest comment: 2 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

I am not looking forward to find "excuses" or something similar like El_C would love claim it... I am pro finding solutions and neutral POV. Looking at my edit history it is clear that 90% of them are in favour of the points mentioned. I would request people to join the started Discussions on the TP. 1 A actual Edit-Warrior wouldnt even think of doing this. Even the prior to the recent block, I looked forward to find a solution thru discussions. El_C did fail to have a overview over the dispute and failed to find a fair solution. If the reviewing admin takes some time with this problem, he/she will surely understand. --InNeed95 (talk) 13:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Blablubbs: You re confused. I literally explained that I know it might look like edit warring. I acknowledge that I indirectly did it. I meant that I directly do it. Like on porpuse. I explained why I did revert the edit (diff given above by me). As such, I dont know what u re talking about. --InNeed95 (talk) 15:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm having trouble parsing this comment. You state that blocking you for edit-warring was Hilarious because [you] didnt, yet also acknowledge that [you] indirectly did it and directly [did] it? In any case: Edit warring is the act of repeatedly overriding someone else's edit in order to reinstate your preferred version of a page. That is unambiguously what you are doing on Serbia, in spite of multiple blocks for it. It does not matter whether you have reason to believe that your version is the "correct" one (all edit warriors do) or whether you also participate in a talk page discussion; it is still disruptive, and it is still edit warring. I believe El C's block is necessary to prevent further disruption, and as such I stand behind my decline. You are welcome to make another unblock request (I strongly recommend reading WP:EW and WP:GAB first), which will be reviewed by someone else. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Blablubbs: I see. I am sorry for writing things down confusingly. I am stressed and didnt really pay attention. I know very well what "Edit-Warring" is. You dont have to repeat it to me. / I did not believe/see the version that I reverted to as "correct" nor as "prefered". The sentence, which seems to be controversial, was changed by a Sock at first (now blocked indef) and later on by another user. Both without a consense. As such, I reverted the most likely nationalistic POV changes made by those two and asked to join the TP discussion I started. One user did join after 1-2 reverts, though continued to edit the sentence in question again and again without a consense. 1 2 3 4 Unfortunatly, I fell for the provocation and also reverted his edits. 5 6 7

Since my will to resolve the dispute isnt respected (which to be fair, I myself failed to choose the right way to solve the issue thru my reverts), I will refrain from editing the Article Serbia again and also be more cautious in general, if I hopefully get unblocked.

I understand your Viewpoint on the issue User:Blablubbs. I agree, that disruptive editing shouldnt be unpunished. As such, your decline is understandable. Though I hope that you understand my explaination on the issue, too. Additionally I hope that the next Admin to review my next Unblock request does aswell. Best Regards, --InNeed95 (talk) 19:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ups... my mistake. --InNeed95 (talk) 12:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

InNeed95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I took a distance from wikipedia and senseless unblock requests as a gesture of goodwill. It has been +2 Months by now. I would ask the reviewing Admin to read the last conversation on the TP, because I dont think that any adjustment is needed to it and what I wrote does show my regrets quiet well in my opinion. Maybe I might add that I will be relativly inactive and probably will change only a few things if needed. If something is unclear, feel free to ask on my TP. Best Regards, --InNeed95 (talk) 14:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I took a distance from wikipedia and senseless unblock requests as a gesture of goodwill. It has been +2 Months by now. I would ask the reviewing Admin to read the last conversation on the TP, because I dont think that any adjustment is needed to it and what I wrote does show my regrets quiet well in my opinion. Maybe I might add that I will be relativly inactive and probably will change only a few things if needed. If something is unclear, feel free to ask on my TP. Best Regards, --[[User:InNeed95|InNeed95]] ([[User talk:InNeed95#top|talk]]) 14:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I took a distance from wikipedia and senseless unblock requests as a gesture of goodwill. It has been +2 Months by now. I would ask the reviewing Admin to read the last conversation on the TP, because I dont think that any adjustment is needed to it and what I wrote does show my regrets quiet well in my opinion. Maybe I might add that I will be relativly inactive and probably will change only a few things if needed. If something is unclear, feel free to ask on my TP. Best Regards, --[[User:InNeed95|InNeed95]] ([[User talk:InNeed95#top|talk]]) 14:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I took a distance from wikipedia and senseless unblock requests as a gesture of goodwill. It has been +2 Months by now. I would ask the reviewing Admin to read the last conversation on the TP, because I dont think that any adjustment is needed to it and what I wrote does show my regrets quiet well in my opinion. Maybe I might add that I will be relativly inactive and probably will change only a few things if needed. If something is unclear, feel free to ask on my TP. Best Regards, --[[User:InNeed95|InNeed95]] ([[User talk:InNeed95#top|talk]]) 14:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}