- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 17:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delta (Latin) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This short substub contains no useful information and thus fails WP:STUB criteria. It might possibly be adequate for Wiktionary, but currently it's non-informative. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 18:56, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to Delta (letter) The Steve 09:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kurykh 07:28, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - insufficient evidence of the usage of the term hence the problem with verifiability of the article: ["latin delta" + unicode] only 4 hits from mailing lists, which discuss whether Latin pages need some extra characters. `'Míkka>t 08:14, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. My curiosity led me to find the origins of this strange letter; I've expanded the article to indicate that it is a letter used in medieval Welsh transcriptions and was only recently added to Unicode. I've also moved the page to Latin delta to be consistent with similar articles such as Latin alpha and Latin gamma. DHowell (talk) 04:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.