|
#::* Deliberately frustrates and derails discussions severely. Check the appropriateness of his remark: "dudette" is female in [[Talk:Akhil_Bharatiya_Itihas_Sankalan_Yojana#Page_needed_to_verify_the_first_sentence_of_the_Ideology_section.|this]] discussion.
#:::* And the attitude [[Talk:Vidya_Bharati#RSS|here ]].
#::* Vengeful towards editors or edits that are not aligned with his POV. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dylan_Schmorrow&type=revision&diff=692457856&oldid=692457122 here] he interjects in the middle of a series of improvements by another editor, without any discussion and prod`s the article. It was clearly notably and survived. -- <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:AmritasyaPutra|AmritasyaPutra]] ([[User talk:AmritasyaPutra|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AmritasyaPutra|contribs]]) </span></small>
#:::::: Vanamonde93 has stated that the second GA review of [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] was a big learning experience for him. It would be useful if you focused on his conduct afterwards. I hae opened a talk page section [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Vanamonde93#AmritasyaPutra.27s_oppose here], if anybody would like to discuss them further. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 13:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
#::::::: Kautilya3, I was within my rights as an involved editor to make my inputs to review. I did not mention the GA here. Why do you bring it up? His conduct is in question, RFA is permitted to have such discussion. --[[User:AmritasyaPutra|<span style="font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;color: #FF9933">AmritasyaPutra</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:AmritasyaPutra|T]]</sup> 16:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC) ▼#:::::::: I mentioned the [[Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party/GA2|second GA review of Bharatiya Janata Party]] because it was stated by Vanamonde93 as a key stage of his maturation process. (See his answer to Question 3). Given that it was more than a year ago, it would be useful to focus on any events that happened after that. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 19:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
▲#: :::::: Kautilya3, I was within my rights as an involved editor to make my inputs to review. I did not mention the GA here. Why do you bring it up? His conduct is in question, RFA is permitted to have such discussion. --[[User:AmritasyaPutra|<span style="font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;color: #FF9933">AmritasyaPutra</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:AmritasyaPutra|T]]</sup> 16:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
#:::AP, I'm puzzled by your last diff. The [[Dylan Schmorrow]] diff (your last one) appears to be a prod on an article about a US Defense official and I don't understand your 'vengeful and not aligned with his POV' comment. Are you suggesting that Vanamonde93 has a specific POV on this retired US Defense official? Nor do I find evidence of vengefulness since they don't seem to have ever interacted with the other editors. Along with the "We're both at 3RR edit" (sometimes you need to force a discussion and discussions are good for Wikipedia) some clarification would be helpful otherwise this appears to be an attempt to dig through Vanamonde93's contributions throw stuff at them. --[[User:RegentsPark|regentspark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 13:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
#:::: RegentsPark, it is unwise to prod an article while it is in active editing without consulting the editors, it went against his pov too on another article. The intent of forcing other to talk by hitting exactly 3 reverts is malicious. I had interaction with him, I am not digging. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vishva_Hindu_Parishad&diff=next&oldid=621878216 Here] is another example of his bias where he reverts due to his pov and I intervened. --[[User:AmritasyaPutra|<span style="font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;color: #FF9933">AmritasyaPutra</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:AmritasyaPutra|T]]</sup> 16:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
#::::::AmritasyaPutra, you need to clearly explain what this 'POV' on [[Dylan Schmorrow]] is and where Vanamonde93 was vengeful when placing that prod because you're accusing them of using the prod for vengeance and pov pushing. And there is nothing wrong with pushing for a discussion if the other editor (in the 3RR) refuses to discuss the matter on the talk page. In fact, by reverting and posting a message on the talk page Vanamonde did the right thing. I'm sorry, but your India examples appear to be content related disputes while the Dylan Schmorrow and Guatemalan ones are not what you represent them to be. --[[User:RegentsPark|regentspark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 22:28, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
#::::::: RegentsPark, my remarks are based on all the evidence I presented. You have concern on few. You are inaccurate in surmising them as content dispute. Could you be specific about "India examples appear to be content related disputes"? What is your remark on him re-inserting doctored quotes and derailing discussion? I have presented my evidence. --[[User:AmritasyaPutra|<span style="font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;color: #FF9933">AmritasyaPutra</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:AmritasyaPutra|T]]</sup> 01:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
===[[Guatemalan revolution]]===
| 