Content deleted Content added
→Read the talk page archives to review the existing consensus: don't ignore the existing reasons for consensus. suggest an edit. |
|||
Line 243:
:::::Consensus is based on reasons. Is there a reason not to describe Gamergate as Mortensen and Sihvonen do in the source that is cited for the definition of Gamergate? [[User:Sennalen|Sennalen]] ([[User talk:Sennalen|talk]]) 16:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
::::::While the paper refers to Gamergate variously as a "campaign" or a "movement," the overall thrust is that it was the harassment (and in a related sense, the fueling of negative emotions) that made it notable. Consensus seems to be that this is accurately reflected in the definition as we have it. Cheers. [[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] ([[User talk:Dumuzid|talk]]) 16:39, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
| |||