Commons:Deletion requests/File:BSicon uLUECKE.svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

corrupted 203.198.93.225 00:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, the corrupted file is making hundreds of railway diagrams in Wikipedia dis-aligned, and that isn't pretty. But please, after this file has been deleted, have the new file uploaded as soon as possible. --Raphaelmak 15:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why not just upload a new version?   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
maybe the user is to new to overwrite the image? --Matt314 19:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deleded --Matt314 19:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown caching error of Wikimedia Commons. This is a widely used file. Request redirect to temporary substitution File:BSicon uLUECKE2.svg immediately after deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sameboat (talk • contribs) 11:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I completed this incomplete DR. I checked an image page where this file was used, and that looked fine to me. I do not see why this should be deleted. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:16, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's how it becomes after purge and refresh. The page which shows in the temp image is en:Template:HK-MTR route/West Rail. The image is simply void. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 22:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For me, the image displays correctly (4 times I think) in page en:Template:HK-MTR route/West Rail. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:51, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Displays fine for me an several other users. Caching issue seems to be on user side, not on server side. This redirecting creates a great mess and should not be done anyway. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:58, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]