Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pkolo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:30, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pkolo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without improvement or rationale. Notability is not inherited. Could not find any in-depth coverage of this person to show they pass either WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Onel5969 TT me 23:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:31, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Haiti-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:31, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added a few notable references to the page. More articles showed up on other sites beside google search.2600:1001:B108:DB7A:3636:3BFF:FEC7:134A (talk) 13:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1001:B108:DB7A:3636:3BFF:FEC7:134A (talk) 13:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC) Pkolo twitter acount does show a picture his award for the record and only the label can approve that. From the look of it, it's certified with the RIAA2600:1001:B108:DB7A:D050:E7CD:14A9:C480 (talk) 15:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC). <ref> https://twitter.com/pkolo/ref>[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.