Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadeea (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There appears sufficient discussion of the sourcing to show it doesn’t meet our standards. tabloid sources don’t cut it for a BLP Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nadeea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly-sourced self-promotion. References are to tabloid gossip sites, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube. Has been listed before, over 6 years ago however I do not believe that the reason the article was kept then applies now. Subject has clearly not achieved a level of notability to warrant her own article.

No evidence that she meets wp:musicbio: article is entirely self-promotion; hasn't charted; hasn't been certified gold or higher; hasn't had a major tour; hasn't released 2 or more albums on a major record label; isn't representative of a style; hasn't won or been nominated for a major award; hasn't placed highly in a music competition; hasn't performed music for a notable media release; hasn't been placed in rotation; and hasn't been featured on a substantial broadcast segment on national media. Dcfc1988 (talk) 19:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:10, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:10, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:10, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:11, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:11, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete contrary to the claims in 2011 she does not meet the notability guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Absolutely no reliable sources. Even the Daily Star calls the subject "attention hungry". This is a self written biography. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 11:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Plenty of extensive news articles of this artist who has appeared at the Grammy Awards. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

She hasn't won a Grammy, been nominated for a Grammy or even performed at the Grammys. She just turned up and was photographed. That isn't sufficient to meet wp:musicbio or wp:gng. Dcfc1988 (talk) 00:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep she has had lots of coverage, even if she isn't much of a musician she is a celebrity. Rathfelder (talk) 23:16, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are lots of references in her article. But look at them - they're to tabloid gossip pages on The Daily Mail, The Sun and The Daily Star, they're links to Instagram and Twitter posts and they're links to Google searches! They aren't notable or reliable. Dcfc1988 (talk) 00:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.