Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isadar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Isadar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article written by a possible paid editor (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TiffanyTinnell). No evidence of notability. The 46 references consist of blogs, primary sources, and unreliable sources like IMDB. Rather clearly designed to look notable at a first glance with no substance. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:14, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:14, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:14, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lots of fluff and promotion, no substance.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete having a job at a major record label does not make you a notable musician. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  09:17, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 22:14, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.